Christer Holmberg wrote:
My opinion is that people who only implement based on examples, without reading the actual protocol specification, have themselves to blame - and they are going to run into problems sooner or later, no matter how correct the exmaples are.
If people are too lazy to read 3261 I don't think there is anything IETF can do
- or even should spend time on doing.
I agree, but if you don't care about the first example of the most basic
example of an RFC being broken and not fixed, you should not be
surprised if interoperability problems occur
with new implementations.. This was the topic of interoperability
workshop: new implementors seem to all fall in the same "traps".
I just wanted to outline that "small fix" is not synonym of "non-essential".
+
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
