Christer Holmberg wrote:
Hi,
Correction, yes. Essential? Hardly.
This is another question around essential corrections. I think they
not only need to clearly represent a bug or a fix, but need to be
one that is important enough to merit documenting. Just like
software, sometimes you don't ever bother fixing those sev 5s.
Ever.
So, who makes the decission whether a bug (I guess we all agree it IS
a bug) is "important enough"?
The working group, by consensus.
I do agree with you that it shouldn't occur that often, because I see
no reason why one would need to use the affected characters.
But, never the less, the fix MAY be important from a parser
implementation perspective.
If you cannot think of a use case when this would come up, then how can
you claim it may be important?
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 499 Thornall St.
Cisco Fellow Edison, NJ 08837
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
