> >I guess you're saying SIP should have used something like > >"Length:" instead of "Content-Length:" to avoid collision > >with MIME's self-claimed ownership of all field names that > >begin with "Content-"? > > No no. > > I am not talking about the usage of Content-Lenght (or any other > Content- header) in the SIP part of the message. I was > referring to the > usage of Content-Length in the MIME part of the message body.
Ah - thanks for clarifying. So you are referring to the second Content-Length field in the example at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#page-212 -- the Content-Length field with the value 231. I agree it shouldn't be in that example. Looks like something to add to the Essential Corrections. -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
