Hi, >>>I guess you're saying SIP should have used something like "Length:" >>>instead of "Content-Length:" to avoid collision with MIME's >>>self-claimed ownership of all field names that begin with "Content-"? >> >>No no. >> >>I am not talking about the usage of Content-Lenght (or any other >>Content- header) in the SIP part of the message. I was referring to >>the usage of Content-Length in the MIME part of the message body. > >Ah - thanks for clarifying. So you are referring to the >second Content-Length field in the example at >http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#page-212 -- the >Content-Length field with the value 231.
Yes. >I agree it shouldn't be in that example. Looks like something to add to >the Essential Corrections. Ok. Thanks! Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
