At Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:00:42 +0100,
DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> Media security requirements is holding up other chartered items in both
> SIP and AVT. When we considered this for inclusion, we believed there
> were two items that may need agenda item. Overnight Dean seems to have
> taken the time away at the moment, but I remain unconvinced that this
> does not need time.
>
> This is the media-security requirements milestones:
>
> Sep 2007 Requirements for media keying to WGLC (Informational)
> Nov 2007 Requirements for media keying to IESG (Informational)
>
> Which provides the requirements for the mechanism in these charter items
> in SIP.
>
> Dec 2007 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP to
> WGLC (PS)
> Feb 2008 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP to
> IESG (PS)
>
> And these chartered items in AVT:
>
> Dec 2007 Submit in band keying mechanism for SRTP draft for Proposed
> Standard
For what it's worth, being neither chair nor AD, I absolutely want
media-security-requirements to finish and if there are significant
comments on the document, I 100% endorse giving it agenda time.
That said, based on my review and the lack of traffic on the list, my
opinion is that there aren't any major issues[0], so we should declare
victory and move on!
Thanks,
-Ekr
[0] The only real issues I raised in my comment were:
- Should we remove the survey from the appendix. I'm fine
leaving it in, since I was mostly worried about it
needing constant update.
- Requirement R-RECORD. I think we could just take a
straw poll on this one.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
