> -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 April 2008 09:51 > To: Elwell, John > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] RFC 4474 and SBC traversal > > This issue is totally independent from E.164 [JRE] Agreed.
> > I don't like the idea of requiring DTLS-SRTP to provide proof of > possession of the keying material. [JRE] I don't understand. Are you saying you don't want to couple DTLS-SRTP with RFC 4474 or similar? John _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
