On Apr 4, 2008, at 1:19 AM, Elwell, John wrote: > There seems to be some interest in adding some indicator to the URI or > to the header field to warn of the limited guarantee of authenticity > or > the opposite (i.e.,lack of such an indicator would mean the > guarantee is > low, i.e., the identity has not been verified). > > I think on this issue it is just a matter of somebody putting things > together into a draft. I think Dean and/or Adam were the main > initiators > of this proposal - something like a source=pstn parameter. Would > somebody care to author a draft? Or do we need further discussion? > > John
I think more discussion is needed of what we want to accomplish before we can sort out what mechanism are needed. There seems to be a wide range of assumptions about what we want. Culle <with my individual contributor hat on> > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
