From: "Elwell, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [JRE] But what about other parameters on the right hand side. For example, is tel:+123456789 an alias for: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;gr=abd76gd6 ?
I don't think so. And is: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone; an alias for: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;gr=abd76gd6 ? I don't think so And is: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;gr=abd76gd6 an alias for: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;gr=abd76gd6 ? Possibly, assuming by routing the first one to provider.net it eventually gets changed to the latter and routed accordingly. Personally, I agree with you that these URIs are all "different". But if we consider them to be different, any signing mechanism must consider them to be different, and any transport mechanism must avoid changing one of them into another. Previously in this discussion, people have argued that SBCs are not behaving incorrectly when they change one of these URIs into another, and that thus any signing mechanism must tolerate such a substitution. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
