I'm not comfortable with this. It may be a technically valid
interpretation, but I have a gut feeling that it will lead to
inconsistent service. But I can't identify a specific case at the moment.
Paul
Dean Willis wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2008, at 11:19 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>>
>> It won't prevent calling the user with the name that looks like a
>> number, at least not if a.com uses a location service. That is because
>> the basic 3261 rules say to ignore the uri params when looking up in
>> the location service.
>>
>
> I disagree. Once you've decided to use an RFC 3261 location service,
> what you say is probably correct. But the parameter can be used to make
> an earlier decision to use telephony routing INSTEAD of using an RFC
> 3261 location service.
>
> RFC 3261 says:
>
>> In addition to DNS and location service lookups shown in this example,
>> proxy servers can make flexible "routing decisions" to decide where to
>> send a request
>
> So DNS is clearly a different sort of lookup than "location service".
> ENUM is a DNS lookup, and I see no reason why "user=phone" is not a
> valid flag for saying "don't do location service, do ENUM or TRIP or
> other telephone routing instead".
> --
> Dean
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
