Francois Audet writes:

 > For the type of feature you are looking at, I think a Tel URI makes more
 > sense. I'm just pointing out with the current state of SIP phones, it
 > probably won't work.

you are starting a new trend here.  usually this wg has not worried what
people have actually implemented.  instead it has kept on producing
countless rfc that are completely ignored by vendors.

you have to face it that the only way to fix the 302 problem is to make
tel uris mandatory.  if there is a list of fixes to rfc3261 somewhere,
please add it there.

-- juha
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to