Hi, >( Aren't we at draft 04 now? )
No. We are now discussing the SIP WG draft, which has been put together based on the requirement in the previous individual draft for SIPPING. >Should the document describe what should happen if you get a 199 and the 199 refers the only leg you have? > > >e.g. > UAC P1 UAS_2 UAS_3 > > --- INVITE ------> > --- INVITE (leg 2) -> > --- INVITE (leg 3) ----------> > <-- 18x (leg 2) ----- > <-- 18x (leg 2) -- > <-- 4xx (leg 2) ----- > <-- 199 (leg 2) -- > > ======================= > what does UAC do now? > ======================= > > <-- 18x (leg 3) -------------- > <-- 18x (leg 3) -- > > <-- 200 (leg 3) -------------- > <-- 200 (leg 3) -- > --- ACK (leg 3) -> > --- ACK (leg 3) -------------> > > >The UAC would have to act as if it hadn't received the "18x (leg 2)" and "199 (leg 2)" message. So it would be as if it >was still be waiting for its first non-100 response. > >This answer is obvious maybe but maybe some explicit text might be useful otherwise the question might come up over and >over. I can add some words about it. Thanks for the comment! Regards, Christer Regards, Attila _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
