On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Well, the specification could be abstracted to remove the mention > of the > B2BUA while still having the same effect. It would have to say > something > about a UAS should send a 199 if it knows the dialog will be > terminated > before it can send the final response. But I think we would still > need > to include an example of a B2BUA in order for anybody to have a clue > what we were talking about.
Could it be explained in terms of a UA that is acting as a protocol gateway? -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
