On 7/9/08 2:30 PM, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
Adam
Roach wrote:
...
In practice, the elephant in your elephant (or small hairy predator) is
the body. You're talking about SBCs, and the thing that SBCs want to
change that breaks RFC 4474 is the body. And that was kind of a
necessary hack back before user agents did much in the way of NAT and
firewall traversal. But any real, commercial user agent I've played
with in the past five years or so has at least rudimentary support in
this area, such that body tweaking is mostly unnecessary.
In other words: there's a better solution than body mangling, and it's
supported by most modern SIP clients. Let's not gut 4474 to maintain
our older, broken network architectures.
Can you send me a link to such a client?
Here are a couple that are both pretty old (one soft, one hard). I
didn't have to go hunting for these; they're just the softphone I have
installed on this machine and the hard phone I have on my desk.
http://www.counterpath.com/x-lite.html&active=4
http://www.snom.com/en/snom360_voip_phone0.html
/a
|
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
