> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam > Roach > > Ah, so this argues for the media-path identity. I don't have as strong > an opinion on that yet. My (possibly naive) first impression is that it > has no better chance of surviving the SBC sausage factory any more than > 4474 does (given that SBCs tend to sit on the media path, too).
Well, it certainly has a "better" chance. I mean we *know* 4474 won't survive *any* SBC, purely by definition of what an SBC does to be an SBC. I *know* this draft will survive *some* deployed SBCs. So it's a "better" chance. How many it can survive across I don't know. For example I do know of deployed SBC's even this PASS mechanism won't survive. (and I'm not talking about particular vendors - I know some providers do modify the PAI) I'm guessing it also has a better chance of surviving more b2bua's in general (not just SBC's) than 4474 would. But there's no doubt it's a gamble. I'm just trying to make the odds as good as possible while still having some payback. > But this doesn't give any rationale for signing P-Asserted-Identity > (which will need to be stripped off as it leaves the enterprise, > rendering your use case pretty much moot). Huh? It doesn't need to be stripped on leaving nor entering the Enterprise. You lost me. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
