I have the impression that at least some of the SBCs (e.g. the one who
has representatives speaking in the forum regularly) are pretty well
equipped to do something new that might be required, without a lot of
hassle.
Paul
Adam Roach wrote:
On 7/11/08 6:49 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
But after listening to all of these problems, I wonder if it might be
necessary to expect SBCs to do *something* that they might not
currently do. And just recognize that this won't work until the SBCs
are updated. In the end we can't work around all the damage SBCs do -
they have some responsibility.
Paul is 100% correct -- if we limit any future protocol extensions to
what will work through unmodified SBCs as they exist today, then we
don't need to meet in Dublin. We're done. Shut the working group down
and send everyone home. Dean and Keith, please be sure to turn the
lights off on the way out.
Let's not the SBC tail wag the SIP dog to death.
/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
