See the response Dean made, but we will come up with a more general post from the chairs to the SIP list on what we expect to ask here.
Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:25 PM > To: ext Robert Sparks; Dean Willis > Cc: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings > Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72 > > >>> I also don't think we need 10mins for > >draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We can > >>> limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss > >that were > >>> not resolveable on the list. > > I also do not think we need to discuss the document during > the meeting. > There are open issues but they are mostly technical in nature and I > don't expect a lot of feedback on these issues during a face-to-face > discussion with a 10 min slot. > > My impression at previous SIP meetings was that there is not > enough time > for some discussions related to the overall direction of the > work. Many > of the detailed discussions on drafts, where often only 5 > folks know the > subject well enough or care about it enough to join the > discussion, are > not really well-spent time given the larger number of folks in the > meeting room. > > > Ciao > Hannes > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
