Hi Dean, >On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote: > >> >> If I ignore the ongoing SIP Identity discussions then I could finish >> the document next week. >> > > >Would it be reasonable to write the SAML doc against RFC 4474, >documenting the issues with RFC 4474 that you've raised, and >then publish as experimental? Then if we ever get Identity >revised, we can come back to the SAML document. And it gets >one more thing off our plate for now.
Sure. That's essentially what we currently have in the document. Still, there is one unresolved issue we never really figured out how to fix: "wrt RFC4474 'absoluteURI' in Identity-Info header field and SIP-SAML implications" http://www.tschofenig.priv.at:8080/saml-sip/issue12 This let us wonder whether we should maybe go for a separate header. > >And I'd still like to have a SAML tutorial. We've had >lunchtime tutorials on things like XCAP in the past that were >well attended. All we need is a sponsor (asking people to pay >for buffet lunch doesn't >work) or a facility that is amenable to "brown bag" lunches in >a conference room. And of course, we need somebody to organize >and present said material . . . I just dropped a mail to Jeff to see whether he is in Dublin. He informed me that he hasn't received an OK from his boss yet. Let's see. I can also give a tutorial myself but there is certainly a difference between the person who wrote the SAML spec and the person who read it. Ciao Hannes > >-- >Dean > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
