In fact I have proposed various tutorial topics to the EDU team, after I organized a Diameter tutorial. I was turned down. I believe the argument was something lke "folks participating in the IETF should obtain their technical knowledge themself"
Ideally, I would like to have one of the SAML authors todo the SAML tutorial part to have the best possible expertise in the room. I, however, don't know whether Jeff is attending this IETF meeting. Alternatively, I could also imagine that a podcast would help to get things explained quite well. >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Brian Rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 17 July, 2008 19:53 >To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); 'ext Robert Sparks'; >'Dean Willis' >Cc: 'SIP IETF'; 'Cullen Jennings' >Subject: RE: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72 > >I have a specific suggestion on this topic. > >I would like to see a late night education session: > >Explain SAML > >Explain how we use SAML with SIP > >Show how the whole thing is used to solve a problem. > >We might ask on the list who would attend such a session, but >I suspect it may be well attended, and after it, you may get >some more feedback. > >Brian > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of >> Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 11:25 AM >> To: ext Robert Sparks; Dean Willis >> Cc: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings >> Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72 >> >> >>> I also don't think we need 10mins for >> >draft-ietf-sip-saml-04. We can >> >>> limit face time to drafts that have open issues to discuss >> >that were >> >>> not resolveable on the list. >> >> I also do not think we need to discuss the document during >the meeting. >> There are open issues but they are mostly technical in nature and I >> don't expect a lot of feedback on these issues during a face-to-face >> discussion with a 10 min slot. >> >> My impression at previous SIP meetings was that there is not enough >> time for some discussions related to the overall direction of the >> work. Many of the detailed discussions on drafts, where often only 5 >> folks know the subject well enough or care about it enough >to join the >> discussion, are not really well-spent time given the larger >number of >> folks in the meeting room. >> >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
