Sedlacek Ivo wrote:
Hello Eric,
thanks for your mail.
 What precisely is the use case behind your request?
The use case is to initiate sharing of a resource (stored at an external server) to participants of a tightly coupled conference (RFC4353).

Can you give a concrete example of what this means?
I'm still totally in the dark about what you are trying to do.

After the tightly coupled conference is established, a participating client sends a SIP request containing a MIME body of MIME type message/external-body (RFC2017) towards the focus. The "URL" parameter of the Content-Type header of the MIME body contains URL of the resource to be shared. The "handling" parameter with value "xyz" of the Content-Disposition header of the MIME body indicates to the focus that this is not a regular message/external-body but it is a request to initiate sharing of the resource to participants. When the focus receives a SIP request with the MIME body of MIME type message/external-body with the "handling" parameter of Content-Dispotion header set to "xyz", the focus will start sharing the resource indicated by the URL of the MIME body of MIME type message/external-body.

I have no clue what it means for the focus to share the resource.

I'm going to reserve judgment about this topic until I have an idea what you are trying to do.

        Thanks,
        Paul

If the focus received the SIP request with the MIME body of MIME type message/external-body WITHOUT the "handling" parameter of Content-Dispotion header set to "xyz", the focus would behave differently - e.g. initiate the SIP requests towards the other participants and include there the MIME body. Other considered method is to initiate sharing of the resource using 5.2. Adding Participants of RFC4353 - the participating client indicates to the focus to add the resource as added participant. The focus applies a special policy when the focus detects the referred URI is not a user. Kind regards *Ivo Sedlacek*
Siemens
PSE CZ TMM MMA8
phone: +420 5 3877 6532 <tel:+420543106532>
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Mailcode: tL3PbjBL
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* ext Eric Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 19. září 2008 22:04
*To:* Sedlacek Ivo
*Cc:* SIP IETF
*Subject:* Re: [Sip] [sip] extensions of "handling" parameter of Content-Disposition header

Absolutely.  Here is the deal:

;handling is a parameter that tells the UAS that is MUST (or MAY) understand the body part in its processing of the SIP message. "Understand" usually means "can process" the body part, but that is an implementation issue.

Content-Disposition is a parameter that tells the UAS what to do with the body part.

Now, looking at your question, Content-Disposition is probably not what you want, either. You say, "to signal a particular action which the sender requests from the recipient". That implies signaling. Content-Disposition is not signaling. Content-Disposition is a hint to the UAS as to what it should do with the body. If you want to signal an action at the UAS, then you more likely want one of (new) INFO packages, PUBLISH/SUBSCRIBE, or a new SIP header.

What precisely is the use case behind your request?


On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:16 AM, Sedlacek Ivo wrote:

Just to be absolutely sure - do you mean that it is more appropriate to create a new disposition-type of the Content-Disposition header (rather than creating new "handling" parameter values)? Thanks.

Kind regards

Ivo Sedlacek
Siemens
PSE CZ TMM MMA8
phone: +420 5 3877 6532
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Mailcode: tL3PbjBL

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19. září 2008 14:08
To: Sedlacek Ivo
Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sip] [sip] extensions of "handling" parameter of Content-Disposition header

I can't think why you would want to have added values for the handling
parameter. IMO what you want to do would be better served by values of
the Content-Disposition itself.

        Thanks,
        Paul

Sedlacek Ivo wrote:
> Hello,
> > can anyone please give me an expert opinion on possible extensions of
> "handling" parameter defined in RFC3204/RFC3459?
> > Is it appropriate to extend and use the "handling" parameter of
> Content-Disposition header of a MIME body inserted in a SIP request to
> signal a particular action which the sender requests from the recipient?
> > For example - if the "handling" parameter contained value "XYZ", the SIP
> request recipient would do a special action ActionXYZ using the MIME
> body. If the MIME body was included in the SIP request without the
> "handling" parameter, the recipient would NOT do the special action XYZ
> and instead would just store or render the MIME body.
> > AFAIK, RFC3204 defines parameter "handling" of Content-Disposition
> header of a MIME body with two defined parameter values "required" and
> "optional" and allows for possible future extensions. RFC3204 also
> states "The handling parameter, handling-parm, describes how the UAS
> should react if it receives a message body whose content type or
> disposition type it does not understand". RFC3459 says "The protocol
> described here is identical in functionality to RFC 3204 with respect to
> SIP.".
> > Kind regards > > *Ivo Sedlacek*
> Siemens
> PSE CZ TMM MMA8
> phone: +420 5 3877 6532 <tel:+420543106532>
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Mailcode: tL3PbjBL
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for new developments on the application of sip


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to