Hi, Christer Holmberg wrote: >> >>But I suppose we are talking about networks where some B2BUAs will get >confused if you try the media from a different IP address from >where you do SIP (although if you have something like a >>carrier grade NAT between the UA and the B2BUA there is no guarantee >that SIP and RTP would come from the same IP). Perhaps it >would be good enough to use two different instance id's? > >It doesn't have to be a B2BUA. It can be any kind of "gate >control node" >which will not allow media to pass unless there is an >associated SIP session. >
Yes, but I think such a node will need some information about SIP sessions and that is given by a B2BUA-ish element (since it needs to dig into SDP). But OK, the bottom line is that some folks claim they want to deploy SIP in such a way that media and signaling are strongly associated like that. Do you know if a lot of them are *really* doing it too? >Regards, > >Christer > Markus _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
