2008/10/28 Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
>
>  > Ok, but which is that request and response?
>
> i don't care, whatever ietf had decided on, e.g. options, info, or
> something new.

> if you implement presence based version of this, UAs
> need to be changed anyhow.

Why? a UA supporting Dialog Event package (as a server) alreays allows
the mechanims defined in this draft.


> probably you need to make changes also in
> presence server in order to cope with privacy issues, i.e., who is
> allowed to subscribe dialog state.

The same would be requiered if you send any other request type, wouldn't it?

Regards.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to