Anders Kristensen wrote: > > > Dean Willis wrote: >> Anders Kristensen wrote: >> >>> I think we're talking past each other. The problem is not correlating to >>> the dialog, it's correlating the app-level response to a particular >>> app-level request within a given dialog. >> >> >> Use a transaction-correlation ID in your application-level protocol >> (i.e, in the package specification) if you need this sort of function. >> It's not SIP's problem. > > I don't think I'm trying to make it "SIP's problem". > > I'm arguing that if a response is needed it's much simpler and just all > around better to do the response-to-request correlation by sending the > app-level response in the 200 response to INFO as opposed to sending it > in a separate INFO going in the opposite direction. It doesn't violate > layering and I haven't heard of any real problem with it.
It means that the stack can't send a 200 response to INFO until it has been directed to by the application. That seems like a layering problem to me, not to mention a major stack rewrite. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
