Given that as far as I can see, the last version of this document expired in 2008, I think you must regard any contents as historical.
It was never picked up by the SIP WG. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Iñaki Baz Castillo > Sent: 08 July 2011 17:53 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; > transport=dccp ? > > Hi, draft-jennings-sip-dtls defines: > > - SIP over DTLS over UDP => Via transport: "DTLS-UDP" > - SIP over DTLS over DCCP => Via transport: "DTLS-DCCP" > - SIP over DCCP => Via transport: "DCCP" > > The draft just defines new BNF grammar for Via transport field, but > says nothing about SIP URI ;transport param. > IMHO the draft MUST define a new value "dccp" for ;transport param. > > Regards, > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. > Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP > implementation. > Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip. > Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP > specifications. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation. Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip. Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.
