The only SIP document was RFC 5763. That doesn't define it, and doesn't apparently need it.
Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 08 July 2011 20:52 > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; > transport=dccp ? > > 2011/7/8 DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <[email protected]>: > > Given that as far as I can see, the last version of this document > expired in 2008, I think you must regard any contents as historical. > > > > It was never picked up by the SIP WG. > > Good point, I didn't realize of that. So, is there a draft or RFC > defining SIP over DTLS-UDP? > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation. Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip. Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.
