On 09/16/2011 07:18 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: [...]
There was a recognition that more could be achieved with a new mechanism (for example there was a draft from Vijay Gurbani), but that would have been a separate charter item, and noone seemed to have the enthusiasm at the time to work on it. That doesn't mean that that situation still persists and I'm sure you understand the process for bringing new work into IETF if you want to do something. But that is what it is, new work.
The draft Keith is referring to here, if you are interested, is: "The SIPSEC Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)" [1]. There was a follow-up paper [2] that used the idea in the sipsec URI draft to benchmark TLS per-hop and TLS end-to-end, treating the intermediary proxies as a blind byte forwarder. If you are interested in the paper, drop me a private message and I can send you the PDF. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01 [2] Gurbani, V.K., Willis, D., and Audet, F., "Cryptographically Transparent Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Proxies," Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1185-1190, June 2007, Glasgow, UK. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation. Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip. Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.
