I would suggest moving the discussion to either SIPCORE or DISPATCH. Keith
> -----Original Message----- > From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 September 2011 15:22 > To: Gurbani, Vijay K (Vijay) > Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Horvath, Ernst; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630 > > 2011/9/16 Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]>: > > The draft Keith is referring to here, if you are interested, is: > > "The SIPSEC Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)" [1]. > > > > There was a follow-up paper [2] that used the idea in the sipsec URI > > draft to benchmark TLS per-hop and TLS end-to-end, treating the > > intermediary proxies as a blind byte forwarder. If you are interested > > in the paper, drop me a private message and I can send you the PDF. > > Hi Vijay, the PDF is already accesible in the link below :) > > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01 > > > I would like to comment about this draft, is it the appropriate maillist > for it? > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation. Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip. Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.
