On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Greg Henderson<[email protected]> wrote: > Doesn't the Cseq 2 imply this is already answering a 401, maybe a rough > conclusion.
Well without seeing the actual scenario there is no way to tell because CSeq is not required to start from 1. But now that Mosbah posted it, we can see that's the case. If so, maybe the SIP express router doesn't have nathelper. I > don't think we get "392 192.168.100.14:6060 "Noisy feedback tells" just for > no authentication. I could be wrong. It's early for me and not enough cola > yet. In my tests I'm always seeing this "Noisy feedback..." and it doesn't imply in any problem. Mosbah, usually in my tests, when I send the authentication, I don't set the domain in the username. You are sending it like: [authentication [email protected] password=bob] But I would send it just as : [authentication username=bob password=bob] Have you tried it that way? (I don't know anything about IMS so I'm assuming this is not a special thing of it). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
