Thanks pavel,
I used cloudshark now i am able to see the sip. It showing the - status:
401 unauthorized

29 2.299500 10.224.61.13 10.224.61.22 SIP 1123 Request: REGISTER sip:ims.com
(1 binding) |
34 2.314584 10.224.61.13 10.224.61.22 SIP 1123 Request: REGISTER sip:
ims.com (1 binding) |
39 2.323569 10.224.61.13 10.224.61.22 SIP 1123 Request: REGISTER sip:
ims.com (1 binding) |
41 2.332869 10.224.61.22 10.224.61.13 SIP 570 Status: 401 Unauthorized |
43 2.333258 10.224.61.13 10.224.61.22 SIP 1241 Request: REGISTER sip:
ims.com (1 binding) |
47 2.335517 10.224.61.13 10.224.61.22 SIP 1123 Request: REGISTER sip:
ims.com (1 binding) |
49 2.338780 10.224.61.22 10.224.61.13 SIP 570 Status: 401 Unauthorized |
51 2.339165 10.224.61.13 10.224.61.22 SIP 1241 Request: REGISTER sip:
ims.com (1 binding) |
52 2.344367 10.224.61.22 10.224.61.13 SIP 570 Status: 401 Unauthorized |

so what i need to do to fix this issue.

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Šindelka Pavel <sinde...@ttc.cz> wrote:

> Show me all the parameters you start sipp with, and send me the file.
> tcpdump won't show you that SIP is inside the IP packets unless you add
> some other command line options. That's why I've told you to open the file
> using Wireshark. You can use cloudshark.org if you don't want to install
> Wireshark locally.
> P.
>
> Dne 20.3.2018 v 12:46 Sunil Kumar napsal(a):
>
> Hi pavel,
> Thanks again. I tried tcpdump in parallel but there is no SIP i found all
> are IP, STP, ARP etc.
>
> *[]ubuntu@stress:~$ sudo tcpdump -i eth0 -s 0 -w 0007.pcap*
>
> following i used to read the .pcap file-
> *sudo tcpdump -r 0006.pcap*
>
> thanks,
> sunil
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Šindelka Pavel <sinde...@ttc.cz> wrote:
>
>> Sunil,
>>
>> the exact command would be
>>
>> tcpdump -i interface_name -s 0 -w /tmp/some_file_name.pcap port x.y.z
>>
>> where:
>>
>> - interface_name is the name of the interface through which the machine
>> running sipp communicates with the machine where the server sending the 503
>> is running; if both run at the same machine, the interface name would be lo
>>
>> - /tmp/some_file_name.pcap is the name of the resulting file
>>
>> - xyz is the tcp or udp port at which the server is listening.
>>
>> The typical reason why a server would send 503 is that it has some
>> serious problem, either with your message (such as when you send a message
>> using a TCP transport and indicate an UDP Via), or it has some internal
>> problem which is not related to the received message in particular. The
>> server logs should tell you more but those log messages you've sent were
>> not related.
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> Dne 20.3.2018 v 10:07 Sunil Kumar napsal(a):
>>
>> Thanks for replying. What is the main cause of  of 503 service
>> unavailable according to you. What is exact command for tcpdump.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Sunil Kumar <skgola1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>> Thanks for replying. I am using project clearwater, in which i am doing
>>> stress testing which is using SIPp basically. But when i am running that
>>> command all calls are failing giving 503 error, can you provide some
>>> solution regarding that.
>>>
>>> here i am trying 100 call 5 min is duration and this is going to *sprout
>>> node. *ims.com is my home domain
>>> *[]ubuntu@stress:~$ sudo /usr/share/clearwater/bin/run_stress ims.com
>>> <http://ims.com> 100 5*
>>> [sudo] password for ubuntu:
>>> Starting initial registration, will take 1 seconds
>>> Initial registration succeeded
>>> Starting test
>>> Test complete
>>>
>>> Elapsed time: 00:04:36
>>> Start: 2018-03-20 21:37:12.980619
>>> End: 2018-03-20 21:42:01.082712 <01082712>
>>>
>>> Total calls: 5
>>> Successful calls: 0 (0.0%)
>>> Failed calls: 5 (100.0%)
>>> Unfinished calls: 0
>>>
>>> Retransmissions: 0
>>>
>>> Average time from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0.0ms
>>> # of calls with 0-2ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 2-10ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 10-20ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 20-50ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 50-100ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 100-200ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 200-500ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 500-1000ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 1000-2000ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> # of calls with 2000+ms from INVITE to 180 Ringing: 0 (0.0%)
>>> Failed: call success rate 0.0% is lower than target 100.0%!
>>>
>>> Total re-REGISTERs: 16
>>> Successful re-REGISTERs: 16 (100.0%)
>>> Failed re-REGISTERS: 0 (0.0%)
>>>
>>> REGISTER retransmissions: 0
>>>
>>> Average time from REGISTER to 200 OK: 52.0ms
>>>
>>> Log files at /var/log/clearwater-sip-stress/26840_*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> sprout node log:
>>> *[sprout]ubuntu@sprout:/var/log/sprout$ tail -50 sprout_current.txt*
>>>
>>>
>>> --end msg--
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug uri_classifier.cpp:139:
>>> home domain: false, local_to_node: true, is_gruu: false,
>>> enforce_user_phone: false, prefer_sip: true, treat_number_as_phone: false
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug uri_classifier.cpp:172:
>>> Classified URI as 3
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> common_sip_processing.cpp:180: Skipping SAS logging for OPTIONS request
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:554: Recieved message 0x7f32a422b620 on worker thread
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:571: Admitted request 0x7f32a422b620 on worker thread
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:606: Incoming message 0x7f32a422b620 cloned to
>>> 0x7f32a406b528
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:625: Queuing cloned received message 0x7f32a406b528
>>> for worker threads with priority 15
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> event_statistic_accumulator.cpp:32: Accumulate 0 for 0x2a0f708
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> event_statistic_accumulator.cpp:32: Accumulate 0 for 0x2a0f780
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug utils.cpp:872: Added
>>> IOHook 0x7f32e076fe30 to stack. There are now 1 hooks
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:178: Worker thread dequeue message 0x7f32a406b528
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:183: Request latency so far = 82us
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug pjsip: sip_endpoint.c
>>> Distributing rdata to modules: Request msg OPTIONS/cseq=683401
>>> (rdata0x7f32a406b528)
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug uri_classifier.cpp:139:
>>> home domain: false, local_to_node: true, is_gruu: false,
>>> enforce_user_phone: false, prefer_sip: true, treat_number_as_phone: false
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug uri_classifier.cpp:172:
>>> Classified URI as 3
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug pjsip:       endpoint
>>> Response msg 200/OPTIONS/cseq=683401 (tdta0x7f333c2de180) created
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Verbose
>>> common_sip_processing.cpp:103: TX 282 bytes Response msg
>>> 200/OPTIONS/cseq=683401 (tdta0x7f333c2de180) to TCP 10.224.61.22:46000:
>>> --start msg--
>>>
>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.224.61.22;rport=46000;recei
>>> ved=10.224.61.22;branch=z9hG4bK-683401
>>> Call-ID: poll-sip-683401
>>> From: "poll-sip" <sip:poll-sip@10.224.61.22>;tag=683401
>>> To: <sip:poll-sip@10.224.61.22>;tag=z9hG4bK-683401
>>> CSeq: 683401 OPTIONS
>>> Content-Length:  0
>>>
>>>
>>> --end msg--
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> common_sip_processing.cpp:275: Skipping SAS logging for OPTIONS response
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug pjsip: tdta0x7f333c2d
>>> Destroying txdata Response msg 200/OPTIONS/cseq=683401 (tdta0x7f333c2de180)
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:270: Worker thread completed processing message
>>> 0x7f32a406b528
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:284: Request latency = 220us
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> event_statistic_accumulator.cpp:32: Accumulate 220 for 0x2a0b778
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> event_statistic_accumulator.cpp:32: Accumulate 220 for 0x2a0b7f0
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug load_monitor.cpp:341:
>>> Not recalculating rate as we haven't processed 20 requests yet (only 3).
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug utils.cpp:878: Removed
>>> IOHook 0x7f32e076fe30 to stack. There are now 0 hooks
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:52.719 UTC [7f32e0770700] Debug
>>> thread_dispatcher.cpp:158: Attempting to process queue element
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:54.720 UTC [7f32aa704700] Verbose pjsip: tcps0x7f32a422
>>> TCP connection closed
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:54.720 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> connection_tracker.cpp:67: Connection 0x7f32a422b2e8 has been destroyed
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:54.720 UTC [7f32aa704700] Verbose pjsip: tcps0x7f32a422
>>> TCP transport destroyed with reason 70016: End of file (PJ_EEOF)
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:56.623 UTC [7f32aa704700] Verbose pjsip:    tcplis:5052
>>> TCP listener 10.224.61.22:5052: got incoming TCP connection from
>>> 10.224.61.8:40825, sock=442
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:56.623 UTC [7f32aa704700] Verbose pjsip: tcps0x7f32a422
>>> tcp->base.local_name: 10.224.61.22
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:56.623 UTC [7f32aa704700] Verbose pjsip: tcps0x7f32a422
>>> TCP server transport created
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:56.623 UTC [7f32aa704700] Verbose pjsip: tcps0x7f32a42b
>>> TCP connection closed
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:56.623 UTC [7f32aa704700] Debug
>>> connection_tracker.cpp:67: Connection 0x7f32a42bc998 has been destroyed
>>> 20-03-2018 16:07:56.623 UTC [7f32aa704700] Verbose pjsip: tcps0x7f32a42b
>>> TCP transport destroyed with reason 70016: End of file (PJ_EEOF)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Šindelka Pavel <sinde...@ttc.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sunil,
>>>>
>>>> Please give some solution.
>>>>
>>>> Please give some information.
>>>>
>>>> From what you have sent so far it is clear that the 503 is coming from
>>>> some UAS which I guess is not another SIPp instance running an UAS script.
>>>> So either your UAC script in SIPp is sending something that makes that UAS
>>>> go crazy, or that UAS has some problem irrelevant to SIPp at all.
>>>>
>>>> Pavel
>>>>
>>>> Dne 20.3.2018 v 9:12 Sunil Kumar napsal(a):
>>>>
>>>> Hi team sipp,
>>>> I am getting SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable. Please give some solution.
>>>>
>>>> *[]ubuntu@stress:/var/log/clearwater-sip-stress$ cat
>>>> 21491_caller_errors.log*
>>>> sipp: The following events occured:
>>>> 2018-03-20      19:13:22.256018 1521553402.256018: Aborting call on
>>>> unexpected message for Call-Id '1-21501@1
>>>>  27.0.1.1': while expecting '183' (index 2), received 'SIP/2.0 503 Service
>>>> Unavailable
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 127.0.1.1:41238;received=10.22
>>>> 4.61.13;branch=z9hG4bK-21501-1-0
>>>> Record-Route: <sip:scscf.sprout.ims.com;tran
>>>> sport=TCP;lr;billing-role=charge-term>
>>>> Record-Route: <sip:scscf.sprout. ims.com ;transport=TCP;lr;billing-role
>>>> =charge-orig>
>>>> Call-ID: 1-21501@127.0.1.1
>>>> From: <sip:2010000012@ ims.com >;tag=21501SIPpTag001
>>>> To: <sip:2010000045@ ims.com >;tag=z9hG4bKPjKAqRQhSEDZfI8vg
>>>> 52uWhPdLZWlb4.o7s
>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>> P-Charging-Vector: icid-value="21501SIPpTag001";orig-ioi= ims.com
>>>> ;term-ioi= ims.com
>>>> P-Charging-Function-Addresses: ccf=0.0.0.0
>>>> Content-Length:  0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sunil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sipp-users mailing 
>>>> listSipp-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ------------------
>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sipp-users mailing list
>>>> Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to