On May 21, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Damian Krzeminski wrote:

> Marden P. Marshall wrote:
>> On May 21, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
>>
>>> Dale Worley wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 11:36 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
>>>>> I got asked off the list what the 3.10.1 branch is.
>>>>>
>>>>> svn info http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/rep/sipXecs/branches/3.10.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody? Does it have anything to do with 3.10.1?
>>>> Mardy created it.  It looks like it's to use JVM version 1.5.0.7-1,
>>>> and
>>>> is numbered 3.10.1.1.
>>>>
>>>> Dale
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Let's try not to create branches with names that look like official
>>> releases. We know today it's not 3.10.1, but several months from now
>>> it's not going to be obvious.
>>> D.
>>
>> And what leads you to believe that it is not an official release?
>>
>> -Mardy
>>
>
> I look where (stable) releases are published:
> http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/LatestStable/FC/8/i386/RPM/
>
> The last one has build number 012233
>
> This is how I check to which branch it corresponds:
>  svn log -v -r 12233  http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/rep/sipXecs
>
> And it looks to me like a revision on 3.10 branch (and not on 3.10.1
> branch).
>
> The branch policy is here:
> http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipx-project-processes/sipx-project-processes.html#branches
>
> While there aren't any rules there against creating branches with  
> names
> like "3.10.1", I still think it's confusing.
> D.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>

3.10.1 was only released to an OEM customer.  Creating this branch was  
not an arbitrary decision.  It was driven by the specific requirements  
of the customer.

-Mardy

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to