Damian Krzeminski wrote: > I was trying to upgrade sipx-freeswitch in my development environment. > > #yum --enablerepo sipxecs-unstable update sipx-freeswitch > > But that requires me to install sipXcommserver and some other sipx > packages. I usually install my dependecies as RPMs, but I do not want to > install sipXcommserverLib RPM on my development system. How do people get > around it? > > I am pretty sure that nothing in lib directory should depend on sipXxxx > packages. Shouldn't we split freeswitch packages into "pure freeswitch" > that we treat as any other external dependencies and "sipx freeswitch" that > contains any scripts and modifications that require sipx related variables? > D. >
I decided to open an issue about it after Kevin ran into the same problem. If using standard freeswitch RPM is the way to go we should just do it. But we cannot have an RPM that developers cannot use in our lib directory. Martin - looks like you added this dependency. Can you enlighten us why? D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
