On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:58 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:28 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > > I notice that <userMatch> now admits <transform> children (they don't > > have to be wrapped in <permissionMatch>). Was that intended? > > I notice that in fallbackrules.xsd, <userMatch> can now directly include > <transform>, but that <permissionMatch> has been removed. How do we > validate calls to use gateways now?
I don't understand the question? What does "validate calls" mean in this context? Remember that the permission to call the gateway is in authrules, not fallbackrules. We've never used the permissionMatch capability in fallbackrules (which has nothing to do with authorization). _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
