On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Arjun Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> M. Ranganathan wrote:
>>
>> Why? Any kind of response means the other end is alive.... perhaps I
>> don't understand the issue.  If you use OPTIONS exclusively, I know
>> not to forward that OPTIONS message. Re-INVITEs are end to end.
>>
>
> It's ok if the re-INVITEs are end to end (as long as the park-server gets a 
> response back). Are there any issues with forwarding the re-INVITEs? If 
> indeed there are problems with that, we could probably work in an exception 
> for sipXbridge.

I send my own session timers to the ITSP. Those session timers are
INVITEs. Now I have to forward your session timers as well.

ALL phones send OPTIONS. Why should the park server be different?


>
> Arjun
>



-- 
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to