On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Woof!
>
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:26:05 -0500, M. Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How do I know it is a session timer and not a
>> re-negotiation attempt with the ITSP?
>
> Version number in the SDP field not NOT be incremented.  (I think.)
>
>
> --Woof!
>

I was afraid you might say that. I just hope ALL endpoints are well
behaved in that respect and are careful about updating session version
number for codec renegotiation.  FWIW I have come across only one
obsolete  endpoint that does not like in-dialog OPTIONS -- obsolete
FSX 104.  Any others?

Ranga



-- 
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to