On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 10:16 -0500, Robert Joly wrote: > > On 11/21/08, Robert Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Robert Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> wrote:>> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Arjun Nair > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I>> > M. Ranganathan wrote: > > >> >> >>
> > > > I already to session timer support for interaction with the > > ITSP since I cannot rely upon UAs to provide session timer > > re-INVITE. I hence have no need to forward your session timer INVITE. > > So, if I understand correctly, the problem is one of unecessary > overhead? Given that Arjun's re-INVITE is once every 5 minutes for held > calls, I do not think this represents any kind of load to lose sleep > over unless I'm missing something. > so are we all agreed on the following? xecs-1594 (stuck moh) behavior: - leave fix as is (OPTIONS for moh; reINVITE for park orbit) - sipxbridge will deal with this appropriately -kathy _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
