I need some input here: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-3616
XCF-3616 suggests that if admin selected host name as a SIP domain name we should stop them from adding redundant servers. Do people think we should really be that restrictive? It is conceivable that one prefers to reconfigure DNS to make it work to changing SIP domain, right? As far as I know SIP domain that is equal of your host name is not even the default configuration. So if someone went through the troubles of changing this default once why should we stop them from changing it again. Just to remind where I am coming from. sipXconfig is not a tool for policing your network. If you happen to have invalid hostnames or strange DNS configured sipXconfig can point out the errors but it really should not prevent you from configuring something. Damian _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
