On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 13:22 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > I need some input here: > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-3616 > > > XCF-3616 suggests that if admin selected host name as a SIP domain name we > should stop them from adding redundant servers. Do people think we should > really be that restrictive? It is conceivable that one prefers to > reconfigure DNS to make it work to changing SIP domain, right? > > As far as I know SIP domain that is equal of your host name is not even the > default configuration. So if someone went through the troubles of changing > this default once why should we stop them from changing it again. > > Just to remind where I am coming from. sipXconfig is not a tool for > policing your network. If you happen to have invalid hostnames or strange > DNS configured sipXconfig can point out the errors but it really should not > prevent you from configuring something. > > Damian >
If the configuration in question is valid and *can* work, then sipXconfig should not restrict it, in my opinion. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
