Raymund, I've seen several references now for folks not to use VM in production, as its only safe for testing, so I guess that holds true for Xen also?
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Raymund Nones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi John, > > For multiple instances, one option is to go via virtual machines. > There is an opensource VM app called Xen. You may want to check this > out. > > Raymund > > On 8/18/08, John Buswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have sipx running quite happily bound to a specific IP for its first > > instance. I used a fedora core 8 "image" that I chroot'd into, and > installed > > sipx via the fedora core 8 instructions on the site (via yum). There are > a > > couple of processes though that are ignoring the hardcoded IP (in > > config.def) and I was wondering if anyone knew how to force them to bind > to > > the specific IP, the processes in question are: > > > > sipxacd which is bound to 0.0.0.0:8110 > > sipxpresence which is bound to 0.0.0.0:8111 > > watchdog which is bound to 0.0.0.0:8092 > > > > Basically what I am trying to do is setup about 4 or 5 (very low call > > volume, very small number of phones (less than 5)) instances of sipx on > the > > same machine. So if there is a better way to do this, please feel free to > > clue me in :) > > > > Thanks > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > > Unsubscribe: > > http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
