On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:33 -0600, voice wrote: > This was the only/main reason to stick around sipX. This is what i > have called managed Open Source. In real Open Source you don't remove > features that compete with Pingtel and now Nortel commercial product. > Why would anyone buy Pingtels, Nortel and the inGates' of the world. > I bet you my bottom dollar that this feature is in their commercial > product. Now you know why Nortel bought Pingtel. > > The same reason why Cisco bougt Linksys. 10 years ago when Linksys > offered a firmware update/upgrate that turned their wireless Access > Point to become a Bridge at no additional cost i was at that time > buying Cisco 340 bridges for nearly $2,000 a unit. In AP mode the > cisco and Linksys were rated in practical install testing identical. > One costing $2,000 the other $300. I said to myself why on Earth is > Cisco allowing this to happen. Within 90 day Cisco bought Linksys. > > I can only hope that the Pingtel guys were 100% 401k holding Nortel > stock. > > To Ranga. You should brush up your Resume and get out of there. > > r
Even here in the world of "real Open Source" there is such a thing as timetables and the limits of what a developer can do in a given time. Personally I think the functionality currently provided by sipXbridge is a huge step forward for sipX, but then again, I'm biased. Kevin _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
