Hi Scott Took a look at the Nortel's SCS500 and now i understand what i perceive is the 4.0 go slow release to coincide with Nortels SCS500 product release. Must not get a head of Nortels' production schedule. And it's is obvious why you have neutered sipXbridge. Could it be because the Nortels SCS500 has features that would be redundant in sipXbridge. This is a corporate scam. This OpenSource is in the pocket of Nortels existing product release schedule. Even Redhat could not pull off what you guys were able to collude.
Tell us Scott what department inside Nortel does sipX OpenSource answer too? r Re: [sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Scott a.. From: "Scott Lawrence" <scott.lawre...@xxxxxxxxxx> b.. Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:04:19 -0500 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 11:53 -0600, voice wrote: > Please name the commercial version you are talking about I meant the Nortel SCS500 http://www.nortel.com/scs500 sipXecs version 4.0 will be the basis for SCS500 version 3.0 -- Scott Lawrence tel:+1.978.288.5508 sipXecs project coordinator - http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/ SCS Senior Architect - Nortel Networks SCS500
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
