<[email protected]>, "Tony Graziano" <[email protected]> wrote: > Since you would have to define the way sipxbridge protocol works, wouldn't it > be easier to define the IP address of sipx and just give it highest priority > with any firewall that can do this? >
In my testing I have found that linksys, dlink and a few other "SMB" firewall routers that have QOS features are session based QOS devices and not packet QOS devices. What I mean is that bandwidth reservations are applied at the time the session is created. So for example, if a user started a really large download duing a "no call period", it will not be restricted because there is no established voice session running through the firewall. If the call is established first, and start a download then the download is properly restricted. So smb routers have not been very useful. I've also tried pfSense with the same results. I just found Edge2WAN...looks interesting the price isn't super high....I will also check out untangle. thanks! _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
