On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 22:02 -0500, li...@grounded.net wrote: > I'm kinda confused about the project at this point. I moved to this > project because I was tired of messing with asterisk. The promise of > HA, clustering and off loading the media were the motivating factors. > The clustering alone was a godsend. > > As I get to know this better, it's looking more like a not quite there > distributed setup, meant more for salability than high availability.
It's true that what is really "high availability" is the ability to make and receive calls. That's not what one would really like, but it's far better than having the entire PBX stop functioning when the server loses its disk drive. In a perfect world, we would have made all the services high availability. What HA features do alternative software PBXs provide that you would prefer in the next release, compared to the features that are now proposed for the next release? Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
