On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 08:18 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 23:16 -0400, John Buswell wrote: > > You can achieve (1) by using separate chroot environments (one per > > instance). I set this up about a year ago for a client, had no > > problems with it. > > When using chroot, can you avoid installing sipXecs separately into each > environment? (We want to do that, so the kernel knows that all the > processes are executing the same binary.)
In theory, you could do this by creating the right hard links. You need to build a chroot environment for each that has everything in it, but they can all be links to the same files, and then the OS would do the right thing. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
