> 
> I've seen a bunch of traffic on the list implying that to use 
> an ITSP you have to turn off 'Internet calling'.

Correct, when sipXbridge is used, Internet callign should not be used.  

> 
> Should I be able to follow the cheat sheet on the wiki wrt 
> remote workers and have it not break my ITSP functionality or 
> these mutually exclusive?

Most definitely. A lot of effort has gone into making sure that the
remote worker and ITSP features can co-exist.  I'm not aware of any
outstanding bugs regarding interactions between the two and we use such
a configuration in our live trials here every day.


> 
> FWIW I already have the ports forwarded in the (SIP aware) 
> firewall 

My personal experience is that SIP aware routers very rarely get it
right and generally cause trouble when sipXbridge and/or remote worker
features get used.

> and my bridging working to voip.ms, phones on the 
> internet (themselves NOT behind nat for now) can register 
> fine and communicate with the IVR system but I cannot 
> establish a voice path with any of the polycoms and the talk 
> path to the IVR only works for about 30 seconds or so. 
> Polycoms and soft phones can talk directly to my ITSP (w/o 
> sipXecs) from behind this firewall without the phones or ITSP 
> being configured for NAT traversal, so I believe the firewall 
> and its SIP support are roughly working.
> 
> -Eric
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List 
> Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
> 
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to