No, has nothing to do with one gateway on two rules...
But this is expected behavior.... Research multiple dial plans matching same dial string. Discussed over, and over, and over... From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Rene Pankratz Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 6:42 AM To: sipx-users Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Auth required for a call from unmanaged GW tounmanaged GW (with no perm. configured)? I already answered the Question myself. After removing the unmanaged GW from the dialing rule with permissions the other dialing rule without permission works like a charm. Is it expected behaviour, that you cannot use a gateway on 2 dialing rules (one with, and one without permissions)? afaik I cannot add an unmanaged GW twice to the same SipX config, right? So how to solve this problem? René 2010/5/7 Rene Pankratz <rene.pankratz.l...@iant.de> Hello, I have a PSTN GW and another unmanaged GW connected to the SipX (4.0.4). Incoming calls from PSTN that match an extension (e.g exact match on ext "298") shall be routed to the other unmanaged GW. But unfortunately the SipX wants the PSTN GW to be authenticated and sends a 407. No permission is configured to be needed in the dialing rule for the second unmanaged GW. Of course incoming calls ID also do not match an existing user on SipX. When I disble the dialing Rule I get a 404 not found. So the dialing rule is the one that matches. I have another dialing rule in my diaplan that needs permissions and also uses the unmanaged GW. Is it not possible to route calls to specific extensions without a permission through the GW when another dialing rule (with permissions) also uses the GW? Thanks in advance René
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
