No, I don't have multiple dialplans matching same dialstring. Disabling the dialing rule without permissions results in a 404 Not found. So there cannot be another dialing rule matching the same dial string(?)
Rene 2010/5/7 Picher, Michael <mpic...@cmctechgroup.com> > No, has nothing to do with one gateway on two rules… > > > > But this is expected behavior…. Research multiple dial plans matching > same dial string. Discussed over, and over, and over… > > > > > > > > *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto: > sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Rene Pankratz > *Sent:* Friday, May 07, 2010 6:42 AM > *To:* sipx-users > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Auth required for a call from unmanaged GW > tounmanaged GW (with no perm. configured)? > > > > I already answered the Question myself. After removing the unmanaged GW > from the dialing rule with permissions the other dialing rule without > permission works like a charm. > > Is it expected behaviour, that you cannot use a gateway on 2 dialing rules > (one with, and one without permissions)? > > afaik I cannot add an unmanaged GW twice to the same SipX config, right? > > So how to solve this problem? > > René > > 2010/5/7 Rene Pankratz <rene.pankratz.l...@iant.de> > > Hello, > I have a PSTN GW and another unmanaged GW connected to the SipX (4.0.4). > > Incoming calls from PSTN that match an extension (e.g exact match on ext > "298") shall be routed to the other unmanaged GW. > But unfortunately the SipX wants the PSTN GW to be authenticated and sends > a 407. > > No permission is configured to be needed in the dialing rule for the second > unmanaged GW. Of course incoming calls ID also do not match an existing user > on SipX. > > When I disble the dialing Rule I get a 404 not found. So the dialing rule > is the one that matches. > > I have another dialing rule in my diaplan that needs permissions and also > uses the unmanaged GW. Is it not possible to route calls to specific > extensions without a permission through the GW when another dialing rule > (with permissions) also uses the GW? > > Thanks in advance > René > > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
