I think that when planning setup with remote locations one may want to take a look at AuidioCodes SAS (Stand Alone Survivability) functionality.
> -----Original Message----- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of > Tony Graziano > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:32 PM > To: don.mcil...@nrtnortheast.com; nwatk...@garrettcounty.org; > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Remote Location - 45 phones - > separate server ornot? > > Its easy enough to do with a local analog gateway. Without > registering the phone can send calls to the gateway. That > should be a no brainer by now. > ============================ > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org> > To: Nathaniel Watkins <nwatk...@garrettcounty.org>; > sipx-users <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> > Sent: Thu Jul 01 11:20:34 2010 > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Remote Location - 45 phones - > separate server ornot?You will also need to look at how your > ITSP handles > 911/999 emergency > calls. If the 'remote' location has a separate emergency > center to receive 911/999 etc. you will need to address that. > > > Regards, > Don McIlvin > > Telecom Department > Realogy/NRT/Coldwell Banker > 52 Second Ave. (3rd Floor) > Waltham, MA 02451 > Office 781-684-5669 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of > Nathaniel Watkins > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 10:44 PM > To: sipx-users > Subject: [sipx-users] Remote Location - 45 phones - separate > server or not? > > I've just been given the go ahead to replace one of the phone > systems at one of our remotes sites. I'm debating whether to > put a separate sipx server at this location or run these > phones off of my main sipXecs install. > > We have a shared point to point T1 circuit between the two > locations (20 of the 45 users also use this circuit for > internet/email/etc.). All inbound/outbound calls will route > thru the PRI at our main location. > > Any strong feelings / recommendations one way or another? > > This message and any files transmitted with it are intended > only for the > individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended > individual(s) or entity named you are hereby notified that > any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon its > contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in > error, please notify the sender, delete the original, and > destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed > to be secure or error-free as information could be > intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or > incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County Government > therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or > omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a > result of email transmission. > > > Garrett County Government, > 203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 > www.garrettcounty.org _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List > Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > > > "The information in this electronic mail message is the > sender's confidential business and may be legally privileged. > It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this > internet electronic mail message by anyone else is > unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any > disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or > omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may > be unlawful." > > "The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments > were free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious > code when sent. This message and its attachments could have > been infected during transmission. By reading the message and > opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full > responsibility for taking protective and remedial action > about viruses and other defects. The sender's employer is not > liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this > message or its attachments." [v1.0.07.109] > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List > Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List > Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
