Ok if you're sure it will work go ahead. But be prepared to fork over 
for another T1 or a different solution altogether (such as MPLS) just in 
case things don't work out.

Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676


On 7/1/2010 3:52 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> We've been doing some traffic logging on the T1 - we easily have 1 meg 
> available at any given time (and will of course be doing qos).  I'm going on 
> the basic assumption that we will need to support 10 concurrent voice 
> connections over the T1.  This 'remote' is about 5 miles away from our main 
> location - 911 calls will just use the caller-id for their information (same 
> 911 center handles both locations).  I have an advantage in that I am in 
> charge of IT for our 911 center as well - so 911 will be a relatively easy 
> issue for us to sort out.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McIlvin, Don [mailto:don.mcil...@nrtnortheast.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 11:21 AM
> To: Nathaniel Watkins; sipx-users
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Remote Location - 45 phones - separate server or 
> not?
>
> You will also need to look at how your ITSP handles 911/999 emergency calls. 
> If the 'remote' location has a separate emergency center to receive 911/999 
> etc. you will need to address that.
>
>
> Regards,
> Don McIlvin
>
> Telecom Department
> Realogy/NRT/Coldwell Banker
> 52 Second Ave. (3rd Floor)
> Waltham, MA 02451
> Office 781-684-5669
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Watkins
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 10:44 PM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: [sipx-users] Remote Location - 45 phones - separate server or not?
>
> I've just been given the go ahead to replace one of the phone systems at one 
> of our remotes sites.  I'm debating whether to put a separate sipx server at 
> this location or run these phones off of my main sipXecs install.
>
> We have a shared point to point T1 circuit between the two locations (20 of 
> the 45 users also use this circuit for internet/email/etc.).  All 
> inbound/outbound calls will route thru the PRI at our main location.
>
> Any strong feelings / recommendations one way or another?
>
> This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the
> individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or 
> entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you 
> have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original, 
> and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure 
> or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County 
> Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or 
> omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email 
> transmission.
>
>
>   Garrett County Government,
> 203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 
> www.garrettcounty.org _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: 
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
>
> "The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's confidential 
> business and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
> addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by anyone else 
> is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance 
> on it is prohibited and may be unlawful."
>
> "The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any 
> virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and 
> its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the 
> message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
> responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and 
> other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage 
> arising in any way from this message or its attachments." [v1.0.07.109]
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>    
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to