Perhaps... My point is itsp signalling is different than gateway signalling.

How the gateway interprets it is one thing, what is being sent is another.

============================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

----- Original Message -----
From: Josh Patten <jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us>
To: Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>
Cc: dwor...@avaya.com <dwor...@avaya.com>; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
Sent: Mon Jul 12 18:48:54 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Call transfers

If I am correct the ITSP should never see internal extensions calling
internal extensions, which is essentially what happens when you
conference someone internally with an outside caller.

Like I said before, the scenario the original poster explained works
whenever using an Audiocodes Mediant 1000 which means it's the gateway
(AKA sipXbridge) hanging up the call, not the phone.

Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676


On 7/12/2010 5:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Er... Could be itsp signalling. I wouldn't put all my eggs in sipxbridge
> as
> the issue...
> ============================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> To: WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)<dwor...@avaya.com>
> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org<sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
> Sent: Mon Jul 12 18:36:15 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Call transfers
>
> Being that sipXbridge is the only difference I would bet so.
>
> Josh Patten
> Assistant Network Administrator
> Brazos County IT Dept.
> (979) 361-4676
>
>
> On 7/12/2010 3:57 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>> [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten
>> [jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us]
>>
>> Dale I think this is a sipXbridge specific request because this
>> functionality exists when using Audiocodes mediant 1000 gateways (the
>> helpdesk where I work uses it all the time)
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> I would bet not.  But the best approach would be getting snapshots of
>> succeeded and failed cases and identifying what happens.  (You can attach
>> them to the issue for reference.)
>>
>> Dale
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to