For the record, Tony, I *am* using 3.1.3 RevC.
Jake Ballamis Technical Support Manager p. 801-566-TECH (8324) f. 801-208-9317 jballa...@alliancetechsolutions.com <mailto:li...@bzzlink.com> This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Copying, forwarding or distributing this message by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer, This e-mail may have been monitored for policy compliance. From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:12 PM To: Josh Patten Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Call transfers Does anyone feel like asking what firmware he is using on the phones? Also, the thread should be titled "adhoc conferencing on polycom phones with siptrunk". I'm not sure I would describe this as a transfer at all. I would hope he is using 3.1.3RevC firmware and not 3.2 stuff, which is known to have a few issues. On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Josh Patten <jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us> wrote: Dale I think this is a sipXbridge specific request because this functionality exists when using Audiocodes mediant 1000 gateways (the helpdesk where I work uses it all the time) Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 7/12/2010 2:00 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > ________________________________________ > From: Jake Ballamis [jballa...@alliancetechsolutions.com] > > So the behavior is expected, then, from what you're saying. > > The end result I am looking for is being able to do a 'warm' transfer, > in that there is a brief conference between the three callers, then the > middle caller drops out. Is this feature not something that sipx can do > presently, or am I just going about that method incorrectly? > ________________________________________ > > Like many things in SIP, this feature requires proper participation by the phones. In particular, I could tell a phone vendor how to support this feature in a way that would work properly with sipXecs (or any SIP system). > > If you want "warm transfer", enter a feature request in the tracker and then get a lot of people to vote for it. That will put it on the development roadmap. We'll figure out what is needed to make it work in practice. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
<<image001.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
