On 11/23/2010 9:38 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>> I'm running sipXconfig (4.2.1-018971 2010-08-17T02:20:18
>> build20) 64 bit ISO build.
>> I rebooted last night to resolve a java/CPU issue.
>> There have been several threads started related to the high memory usage in
>> Sipx 4.2.1 .
>> I was looking at the performance graphs for the server since the reboot. I
>> noticed something interesting. Take a look at the attached screenshot. I
>> normally hate screenshots, but I couldn't find a better way to show it in
>> this case. My backups run at midnight. It is very obvious in the CPU,
>> memory, and IO graphs when it runs. The interesting thing to me is, the
>> memory utilization doesn't drop at all after the backup is done. CPU and IO
>> both drop back down to normal, but memory never does. The current TOP output
>> is below.
>> Does anyone else see this behavior? Should it be expected?
> Expected, no, but fairly conclusive where the problem may lie!    This
> is certainly useful information.  If you find (one of the many I'm
> sure) bugs reported on this, I'll escalate that to look into for 4.2.1
> in early december.
I cannot find an open bug with the text java and memory in it. I'm not a 
master of searching through jira, so I could be doing something wrong. I 
will keep poking around.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to